TP The business of what comes next Tuesday 13 October 2026 · updated 15:15 Get the weekly briefing
Tomorrow’sPublisher.
Strategy Editors Picks

Publishers see green shoots in Bluesky

News Room · 4 min read

It’s very early days but publishers are reporting promising signs from their engagement with Bluesky.

Publishers are exploring the nascent social media platform Bluesky, assessing its potential compared to established platforms like X and Threads. As Bluesky experiences a surge in new users, the level of referral traffic generated by this fledgling platform remains significantly lower than that from X, prompting many media organisations to adopt a cautious, test-and-learn approach.

According to data sourced from analytics firm Chartbeat, Bluesky has thus far generated around 0.017% of social traffic referrals to publishers from November 1-21, which equates to 0.8% of the referrals that come from X. In contrast, X accounts for about 2.5% of social referrals. Some publishers have reported more robust engagement on Bluesky than on Threads, with executives cautioning that comprehensive strategies for the platform are premature.

The bulk of the conversations surrounding Bluesky suggest that most publishing teams are recycling content across platforms. Speaking anonymously to Digiday, the head of social media at a large publisher said, “We are posting basically the same stuff there that we have posted on X and Threads. And that has worked for us thus far.” Similarly, Benjamin Cohen, CEO of PinkNews, acknowledged that duplicating content across these platforms allows his team to gauge specific nuances in audience reaction while bolstering their presence on Bluesky.

Initial reports reveal that some publishers are harvesting encouraging data. Matt Karolian, vice president of platforms, research, and development at Boston Globe Media, noted that traffic from Bluesky to their site has already tripled that of Threads, yielding an impressive 4.5 times the conversions to paying digital subscribers. “The quality of the new traffic is notable,” he commented, though he refrained from disclosing specific conversion rates.

Nevertheless, challenges persist. Publishers have pointed out Bluesky’s lack of functionality for tracking specific user activity when they visit publisher sites. Several executives have resorted to using UTM codes for traffic tracking while contending that this approach may not provide a complete picture. One head of platforms from a local news outlet explained that while they track Bluesky traffic via domain referrals, the data might not accurately reflect the full extent of their audience.

As larger industry players strategise their involvement with Bluesky, early signs indicate varied levels of engagement. The New York Times has recognised promising interactions from Bluesky users but emphasises a continued focus on multiple social networks. Similarly, CNN sees the platform as primarily a mechanism for distributing news aimed at redirecting users back to its own platforms.

The situation at Newsweek reflects a more measured approach, with the organisation posting around 80-100 updates daily on X compared to under 20 on Bluesky. “We are being more deliberate, with much more of a steady hand on the wheel,” said Josh Awtry, SVP of audience at Newsweek, illustrating their intention to foster higher engagement metrics, even if that diminishes reach.

Source: Noah Wire Services

More on this

Tags:
  • Bluesky
  • digital news
  • social media
Advertisement · Noah

Source: Tomorrow’s Publisher

Make sense of what's next.

A weekly briefing for people shaping the future of publishing.

Request the briefing

Opens your email app. Ask the team to receive the briefing.

Free. Email requests are handled by our team.