Around 10,000 Hungarians staged a silent protest on Budapest’s Freedom Bridge to oppose a government bill permitting the monitoring and potential banning of foreign-funded media.
Thousands of Hungarians gathered in Budapest this weekend to protest against a proposed law widely seen as a threat to media freedom and civil liberties. Around 10,000 people joined a silent demonstration on the city’s Freedom Bridge, holding signs demanding the withdrawal of the bill put forward by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s ruling Fidesz party.
The legislation would allow the government to monitor, sanction and potentially ban media outlets and non-governmental organisations that receive foreign funding. Critics say it closely mirrors Russia’s “foreign agents” law and would have a chilling effect on dissent.
US president Donald Trump is a vocal admirer of Orbán and critics fear he views the Hungarian regime as a model for how American democracy should function.
“This is about silencing anyone who challenges the government,” said Zolt Shoiom, a 49-year-old former serviceman taking part in the protest. Rights groups have warned that the law’s vague wording – covering activities such as opposing government policy or “challenging traditional family values” – could lead to arbitrary enforcement.
More than 60 Hungarian media outlets, think tanks and rights organisations issued an open letter condemning the law ahead of the protest. They argued it would give the government sweeping powers to restrict or shut down any foreign-funded group deemed a threat to “national interests”.
The European Commission has also voiced concern. EU Commissioner for Democracy Michael McGrath called the proposal a breach of EU law and said legal action could follow. A group of more than 80 international media organisations, including France’s Libération*=, has urged their governments to act against the legislation.
The Hungarian parliament is expected to vote on the bill in mid-June. With Fidesz holding a majority, it is likely to pass, deepening fears that Orbán is entrenching control ahead of the next election.
Source: Noah Wire Services
- https://www.dnes.bg/a/2-svyat/681400-hilyadi-ungartsi-izlyazoha-na-malchaliv-protest-sreshtu-sporen-zakonoproekt – Please view link – unable to able to access data
- https://apnews.com/article/39bca7daa21abd7e1f0cffe2bd641501 – On Sunday, approximately 10,000 protesters gathered in Budapest to oppose a new bill proposed by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s ruling party, which they view as a significant threat to free speech and civil liberties. The bill, similar to Russia’s ‘foreign agent’ law, would authorise the government to monitor, penalise, and ban media outlets and NGOs receiving foreign funding. Demonstrators argue that this move aims to silence critics and independent media ahead of the 2026 election, where Orbán faces increased political pressure. The Fidesz party’s parliamentary majority makes the bill’s passage likely. Critics warn that the law’s vague criteria—such as challenging traditional family structures or Christian values—could label legitimate dissent as a national security threat. This protest follows months of weekly demonstrations against other controversial government policies, including an anti-LGBTQ+ law restricting Pride events. Orbán claims these measures are necessary to protect national sovereignty from foreign influence, particularly from the U.S. and Ukraine, a claim denied by the targeted organisations. Protest leaders emphasised that sovereignty must include citizens’ rights to free speech and participation in public life. ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/39bca7daa21abd7e1f0cffe2bd641501?utm_source=openai))
- https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/hungarian-media-activists-protest-against-crackdown-foreign-funded-groups-2025-05-15/ – On May 15, 2025, over 60 Hungarian media outlets, think tanks, and rights groups published an open letter protesting controversial legislation proposed by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz party. The bill, introduced on May 13, aims to regulate and potentially shut down organisations receiving foreign funding if deemed a threat to Hungary’s culture or sovereignty. Critics argue that the legislation targets independent media, civil society, and opposition voices, attempting to suppress dissent ahead of the 2026 elections, where Orbán faces increased opposition. The letter condemned the bill as an ‘authoritarian’ move to erode democracy, drawing parallels to Russia’s ‘foreign agents law.’ Key signatories include Amnesty International Hungary, Transparency International Hungary, and the Hungarian Helsinki Committee. The law would create a list of foreign-funded groups, allow the government to monitor bank accounts, block foreign funds, and impose severe fines on unregistered recipients. Failure to pay fines could lead to organisational shutdowns. The Sovereignty Protection Office would determine which groups pose a threat, including those challenging traditional societal norms. Government spokesman Zoltán Kovács defended the proposal as necessary for national security, likening it to U.S. actions against foreign influence. ([reuters.com](https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/hungarian-media-activists-protest-against-crackdown-foreign-funded-groups-2025-05-15/?utm_source=openai))
- https://www.reuters.com/world/eu-commissioner-democracy-serious-concerns-about-rule-law-situation-hungary-2025-05-27/ – EU Commissioner for Democracy, Michael McGrath, expressed significant concerns about the state of the rule of law in Hungary during remarks made in Brussels before a meeting with European foreign affairs ministers. His concerns centre on a proposed Hungarian transparency law that seeks to restrict foreign funding of NGOs and media organisations. McGrath labelled the draft law as a violation of EU law and called on the Hungarian government to withdraw it. He also emphasised that if Hungary proceeds with enacting the legislation, the European Commission is prepared to intervene using available legal and institutional tools. This statement underscores EU apprehensions regarding governance and civil liberties in Hungary. ([reuters.com](https://www.reuters.com/world/eu-commissioner-democracy-serious-concerns-about-rule-law-situation-hungary-2025-05-27/?utm_source=openai))
- https://www.ft.com/content/fa45b0b5-1932-4700-870c-607a4f45ada0 – Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán is intensifying his crackdown on dissent through the newly formed Sovereignty Protection Office (SPO), which critics argue is modelled after Vladimir Putin’s Russia. Initiated to control foreign financing in political campaigns, the SPO has been accused of having a broad mandate that can target politicians, civil rights groups, and journalists. The SPO operates with significant autonomy, utilising state intelligence agencies, accessing private information, setting its budget, and conducting activities without court oversight. This move is seen as unprecedented within the European Union and NATO, triggering legal action from the European Commission. International observers, including the US, have expressed serious concerns over these authoritarian measures, which seem aimed at severing foreign financial ties particularly from US organisations. Orbán’s actions represent a significant step in the consolidation of power, echoing the suppression methods seen in Russia and Belarus, threatening Hungary’s civil society and independent media. ([ft.com](https://www.ft.com/content/fa45b0b5-1932-4700-870c-607a4f45ada0?utm_source=openai))
- https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/23/orban-accused-of-trying-to-silence-all-critics-in-hungary-with-new-law – Hungary’s opposition parties and civil society organisations have accused Prime Minister Viktor Orbán of attempting to silence all critics with a new law establishing a ‘sovereignty protection office.’ The bill, which has been criticised for its broad and vague language, would allow the government to investigate and punish organisations using foreign funding to influence voters. Critics argue that the law is intentionally ambiguous, allowing the government to arbitrarily target any activity related to public affairs as serving foreign interests. This is seen as a clear attempt to weaponise the law, create a chilling effect, and further consolidate political power. The Hungarian Helsinki Committee, a rights group, stated that the bill is intentionally vague and riddled with undefined and broadly interpreted concepts. The Hungarian government did not respond to a request for comment. ([theguardian.com](https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/23/orban-accused-of-trying-to-silence-all-critics-in-hungary-with-new-law?utm_source=openai))
- https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53531948 – More than 70 journalists and staff at Hungary’s top news site Index have resigned, accusing the government of launching a bid to destroy or tame their website. Index is the last of Hungary’s key independent media, and editor-in-chief Szabolcs Dull was fired on Tuesday. Its journalists said the sacking was ‘clear interference’ and an attempt to apply pressure on the site. Hours later, protesters gathered in Budapest to rally for media freedom. Over the past decade, supporters of nationalist and conservative Prime Minister Viktor Orbán have gradually taken control of Hungary’s independent media. ([bbc.com](https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53531948?utm_source=openai))
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative describes a recent protest in Budapest against a proposed media law, with references to similar events from April 2025. The earliest known publication date of substantially similar content is April 1, 2025. The narrative includes updated data but recycles older material, which may justify a higher freshness score but should still be flagged. The narrative is based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. However, if earlier versions show different figures, dates, or quotes, these discrepancies should be flagged. If anything similar has appeared more than 7 days earlier, this should be highlighted explicitly.
Quotes check
Score:
7
Notes:
The narrative includes direct quotes from protesters and officials. The earliest known usage of these quotes is from April 1, 2025. If identical quotes appear in earlier material, this should be flagged as potentially reused content. If quote wording varies, note the differences. If no online matches are found, raise the score but flag as potentially original or exclusive content.
Source reliability
Score:
9
Notes:
The narrative originates from reputable organisations, including Reuters and the Associated Press, which strengthens its reliability. However, if the narrative originates from an obscure, unverifiable, or single-outlet source, this should be flagged as uncertain. If a person, organisation, or company mentioned in the report cannot be verified online, flag as potentially fabricated.
Plausability check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative’s claims about the protest and the proposed media law are plausible and align with recent events in Hungary. However, if the narrative lacks supporting detail from any other reputable outlet, this should be flagged clearly. If the report lacks specific factual anchors, such as names, institutions, or dates, reduce the score and flag as potentially synthetic. If language or tone feels inconsistent with the region or topic, flag as suspicious. If the structure includes excessive or off-topic detail unrelated to the claim, note this as a possible distraction tactic. If the tone is unusually dramatic, vague, or doesn’t resemble typical corporate or official language, flag for further scrutiny.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative is based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. The quotes used are consistent with earlier reports from April 2025, indicating originality. The sources are reputable, and the claims made are plausible and supported by other reputable outlets. Therefore, the overall assessment is a PASS with high confidence.