The Times wants to sell the answer
Planned one-off guide sales could turn occasional usefulness into revenue. The opportunity is worth testing—provided the product earns its price and the subscription keeps its value.

Cartoon · AI-generated
The Times is preparing to sell annual guides to people who want useful information without a continuing newspaper subscription. It is a sensible experiment: charge for helping with a particular decision, rather than expect every paying reader to develop a daily news habit.
For occasional readers, that could mean buying a useful package without committing to the whole paper. Publishers gain another chance to earn from their expertise; the cost falls on the teams that must build, maintain and sell a product distinct enough to justify its price. The decision is whether a guide can earn additional money while keeping a subscription worth having.
Noah gives The Times or The Sunday Times a 78% chance of launching at least one new named guide or finite editorial package for UK consumers to buy once, without a recurring subscription, by 1 November 2027. For the same launch by 28 February 2027, it gives only a 49% chance. These estimates concern new offers launched after 1 November 2026, excluding print books and events. Existing guide franchises support a launch; unsettled pricing, access and geography could delay it.
The big thinking Every Editor’s Pick →
Previous Editor’s Picks & selected reading.
Mail Metro Media makes fewer competing ads a product worth selling
Who’s laughing now? Google loses half a trillion dollars as its AI answers earn less
Future shows why publishers need more than a place in an AI answer
Publishers must share the cost of catching fake research
Publishers should rebuild comments for the readers who never post
The newswire All the latest →
What’s moving in publishing.
Reporting from Noah Wire-
People & Skills
Nordic editors draw new lines as AI rewrites opinion pages
From disputed detection results to stricter submission rules, Nordic newsrooms are grappling with when AI assistance becomes machine-written opinion, and who is accountable for the words readers see.
Artificial intelligence is already changing the way opinion pages are filled, and the awkward question now facing editors is not whether contributors use it, but how much they are allowed to rely on it. At Aftenbladet, Heidi Hjorteland Wigestrand argues that AI can turn a tedious piece into something even more tedious, just at greater speed, and that the real challenge for newsroom gatekeepers is deciding where…
Read the full story → -
Local & Specialist Publishing
Argentine newsrooms draw a line between AI support and editorial judgement
Make sense of what’s next.
A weekly briefing for people shaping the future of publishing.
More from the wire
- Audiences Authors accuse publishers of feeding both sides of the AI fight
- People & Skills Ohio journalists withhold bylines over AI chatbot’s election-year errors
- Policy & Rights NYT Cooking’s AI sous-chef leaves subscribers cold
- AI & Technology Macmillan’s celebrated AI assistant NOA is shut down after staff found it ‘terrible’
Noah Wire. Every publication can have its own wire.
Build yours →The changing business
Tamedia cuts culture desk as AI push deepens newsroom revolt
Staff at Swiss publisher Tamedia are protesting a new round of redundancies and warning that the drive to cut costs and expand AI use is hollowing out editorial ambition.
Authors accuse publishers of feeding both sides of the AI fight
Writers say publishers are defending their rights against AI companies while using the technology to produce marketing and editorial work, deepening a crisis of trust across the industry.
Black Ballad turns a beauty panel into repeat business
Focused reader research gives the British publisher a commercial product. The lesson for others is to solve a recurring buyer problem, reward participation and charge for the work.


The publishing agenda.
A few stories to start with.
Follow a section for the full picture.
Strategy

Future shows why publishers need more than a place in an AI answer
Future already sells AI visibility services. New research on ChatGPT’s partner summaries shows why publishers also need reliable measures of what their expertise earns—and reasons for readers to return.
- Strategy Publishers must share the cost of catching fake research
- Strategy Why AI-assisted style guides are becoming the control layer for consistent publishing
Audiences
AsAmNews pilots WhatsApp election service built on trusted local reporting
- Audiences Broadcasters move from AI experiments to hard choices over control and return
- Audiences Publishers should rebuild comments for the readers who never post
Revenue
Mail Metro Media makes fewer competing ads a product worth selling
- Revenue OpenAI appears to give licensed publishers a hidden head start in ChatGPT
- Revenue Why connected publishing could help African research travel further
AI & Technology
NYT Cooking’s optional AI chef sparks backlash over control
- AI & Technology Macmillan’s celebrated AI assistant NOA is shut down after staff found it ‘terrible’
- AI & Technology AI is turning one broadcast into many newsroom-ready formats
Platforms & Discovery
Why AI images are breaking the single-field rights model
- Platforms & Discovery Who’s laughing now? Google loses half a trillion dollars as its AI answers earn less
- Platforms & Discovery AI-made game wikis are flooding search results and squeezing out fan communities
Policy & Rights
NYT Cooking’s AI sous-chef leaves subscribers cold
- Policy & Rights Alighieria brings AI into publishing’s back office as trust in authorship comes under strain
- Policy & Rights Svenska Dagbladet pulls essay, exposing the new fault line over AI and trust
Products & Formats
Maritime journalists urged to use AI without surrendering editorial judgement
- Products & Formats Rest of World’s funding crisis exposes the AI-driven collapse of referral traffic
- Products & Formats El Comercio wins SIP award for data project mapping Peru’s congressional hopefuls
People & Skills
Ohio journalists withhold bylines over AI chatbot’s election-year errors
- People & Skills Denmark’s Projekt Y launches with AI-assisted newsroom and unanswered authorship questions
- People & Skills ‘AI slop’, ‘AI agent’ and ‘vibe coding’ make the leap into mainstream journalism
Local & Specialist Publishing
Publishers race to win a place in AI-generated news briefings
- Local & Specialist Publishing Former journalists’ bylines revived for AI casino articles after Clickout redundancies
- Local & Specialist Publishing Rock River Current compresses a week of local news into one-minute video briefings
Noah Wire. Every publication can have its own wire.
Build yours →Noah Wire. Every publication can have its own wire.
Build yours →Noah Wire. Every publication can have its own wire.
Build yours →Make sense of what's next.
A weekly briefing for people shaping the future of publishing.
Free. Email requests are handled by our team.