TP The business of what comes next Wednesday 4 November 2026 · updated 05:55 Get the weekly briefing
Tomorrow’sPublisher.
Editor’s Pick Policy & Rights

Meta’s hold on publishers runs deeper than clicks

Subscription acquisition and advertising can matter more than referral traffic. Publishers need to show what replacing those services would cost.

A newspaper seller strains to walk away while an oversized belt around the seller and a platform representative keeps them together. The caption reads: “You’re free to leave whenever you like.”

Cartoon · AI-generated

Inside the Editor’s Pick

British publishers have gained a competition inquiry into Meta’s business terms and a pause in their introduction. The harder question is what it would cost to leave Facebook or Instagram. Publishers challenging the proposed use of their journalism need to show the value of the services they still use, even when those services send fewer readers to their websites.

“Access to audiences should not come at the price of publishers’ content,” Sajeeda Merali, chief executive of the Professional Publishers Association (PPA), said in its 30 October statement. Her members’ objection is commercially precise: winning subscribers and serving advertisers should not require accepting broader uses of their journalism.

The UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) opened its investigation on 30 October. It is examining whether Meta holds a dominant position in relevant UK markets and whether its commercial terms abuse that position. No infringement has been established. For publishers, the useful change is a formal route to test the conditions of access, rather than another exchange of public assurances.

· 7 min read · Ivan Massow Read the Editor’s Pick →

The big thinking Every Editor’s Pick →

Previous Editor’s Picks & selected reading.

The newswire All the latest →

What’s moving in publishing.

Reporting from Noah Wire
  1. Editorial cartoon accompanying: Academic publishers face the harder task of making legacy archives accessible
    Local & Specialist Publishing

    Academic publishers face the harder task of making legacy archives accessible

    With accessibility deadlines taking effect, publishers must tackle decades of complex backlist content. AI can help assess and process archives, but expert review remains vital for scientific material.

    Accessibility in academic publishing is no longer a theoretical concern deferred to some future compliance project. It has become an operational test of whether publishers can actually maintain usable backlists, not just publish new material that passes a checklist. Balamuraly Kanthavelou, writing for The Scholarly Kitchen, argues that the real problem is not awareness of regulation but the difficulty of remediating…

    Read the full story → 4 Nov 2026 · 4 min read
  2. Editorial cartoon accompanying: Kent newsletter network uses AI to scale without handing over editorial judgement
    Products & Formats

    Kent newsletter network uses AI to scale without handing over editorial judgement

    4 Nov 2026 · 3 min read

More from the wire

Advertisement · Noah

The changing business

Explore the sections

The publishing agenda.

A few stories to start with.
Follow a section for the full picture.

Strategy

A blue-clad editor uses enormous gold scissors to cut away most of a long manuscript held by a red-clad publisher.
More Strategy

Audiences

More Audiences

Revenue

More Revenue

AI & Technology

More AI & Technology

Platforms & Discovery

More Platforms
Advertisement · Noah
Advertisement · Noah
Advertisement · Noah

Make sense of what's next.

A weekly briefing for people shaping the future of publishing.

Free. Email requests are handled by our team.