5:33 pm - October 28, 2025

The business information firm won a suit against a firm that used its content to create a competitor.

Thomson Reuters has achieved a notable legal victory regarding the use of copyrighted materials in artificial intelligence, as the company secured a ruling reaffirming its rights under U.S. copyright law.

The decision, made by Judge Stephanos Bibas of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, pertains to a lawsuit filed by Thomson Reuters against Ross Intelligence, a now-defunct legal research firm.

The dispute commenced in 2020 when Thomson Reuters contended that Ross Intelligence had unlawfully utilised content from its renowned legal platform, Westlaw, to develop its own artificial intelligence model without proper authorisation.

In the ruling, Judge Bibas confirmed that Ross Intelligence did not have the legal right to utilise Thomson Reuters’ copyrighted materials to create a competing service. This determination underscores the legal precedents surrounding copyright law as it intersects with emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence. The implications of this case could resonate throughout the industry, shaping how companies approach the use of third-party data in their AI models.

Source: Noah Wire Services

More on this

Noah Fact Check Pro

The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.

Freshness check

Score:
9

Notes:
The narrative includes recent legal developments, such as the Thomson Reuters case and the Baltimore lawsuit against Glock, which are contemporary and not recycled from older news.

Quotes check

Score:
0

Notes:
There are no direct quotes in the narrative to verify.

Source reliability

Score:
8

Notes:
The narrative originates from the Boston Herald, a reputable local publication. However, the reliability could be higher if it were from a more prominent national or international news outlet.

Plausability check

Score:
9

Notes:
The claims about legal cases and warnings from Meta Platforms are plausible and align with current societal concerns regarding AI, firearms, and social media scams.

Overall assessment

Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS

Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH

Summary:
The narrative appears fresh, with recent legal developments and plausible claims. It lacks direct quotes but originates from a reputable source, contributing to its overall credibility.

Tags:

Register for Editor’s picks

Stay ahead of the curve with our Editor's picks newsletter – your weekly insight into the trends, challenges, and innovations driving the future of digital media.

Leave A Reply

© 2025 Tomorrow’s Publisher. All Rights Reserved. Powered By Noah Wire Services. Created By Sawah Solutions.
Exit mobile version
×