The website’s recent experiments with AI chatbots spotlight both the opportunities and challenges faced by modern newsrooms in engaging audiences and maintaining journalistic trust amid evolving technology.
The Texas Tribune’s recent experiments with AI chatbots offer a window into how newsrooms are grappling with the potential and pitfalls of artificial intelligence. Presented at the Hacks/Hackers Journalism AI conference in Baltimore, the Tribune’s trials explored how chatbots might improve audience engagement without undermining trust.
At the heart of the Tribune’s exploration was a question many newsrooms are now asking: can AI-powered chatbots serve as meaningful interfaces between the newsroom and the public?
The Tribune tested chatbots in several contexts, from an AI-powered voter guide to a tool designed to help parents navigate Texas’s proposed school voucher programme. By embedding these bots on relevant pages, they saw a tangible increase in engagement, suggesting that location and context play a critical role in how audiences interact with the technology.
But challenges quickly emerged. Efforts to train an internal chatbot on 15 years of archive content ran into problems when the bot struggled with accuracy, especially on recent developments. The Wall Street Journal has faced similar issues, reinforcing that even large, resource-rich newsrooms are not immune to the shortcomings of LLMs.
Audience appetite remains uncertain too. “I don’t think that chatbots are necessarily be-all, end-all,” said Texas Tribune product manager Darla Cameron, in remarks first reported by Pete Pachal of The Media Copilot. “It helps us see how they can deal with our content, what types of content they’re good at, what types of questions they’re good at answering. But we know that the audience doesn’t want them necessarily.”
According to a Poynter survey, nearly half of respondents were uninterested in getting their information from a chatbot, underlining the importance of understanding when and where such tools are most useful.
The Tribune is now focused on creating more targeted, personalised experiences, including a chatbot that integrates education data to help parents better understand school choice options in Texas. This mirrors efforts by other publishers, such as Germany’s OVB Media, which has developed AI tools to improve newsroom workflows and tailor content more effectively.
Source: Noah Wire Services
- https://mediacopilot.substack.com/p/texas-tribune-media-chatbot – Please view link – unable to able to access data
- https://www.texastribune.org/2024/07/16/AI-texas-tribune-survey/ – The Texas Tribune conducted a survey to gather public opinions on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in newsrooms. The survey aimed to understand readers’ comfort levels with AI-generated content and their preferences for AI disclosure in journalism. This initiative reflects the Tribune’s commitment to transparency and trust in its reporting processes. The findings are intended to guide the Tribune’s approach to integrating AI technologies responsibly, ensuring that the use of AI aligns with audience expectations and journalistic standards.
- https://www.texastribune.org/2024/03/26/texas-government-artificial-intelligence/ – The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is exploring the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in various operations, including incident detection, user access management, automated invoicing, and video analytics for traffic monitoring. These AI applications aim to enhance efficiency and responsiveness in managing transportation infrastructure. The Texas government is also considering policy proposals related to AI, including the establishment of an AI policy-making office and measures addressing data privacy and cybersecurity, reflecting a proactive approach to integrating AI technologies in state governance.
- https://www.texastribune.org/2024/01/02/texas-government-artificial-intelligence/ – In response to increased adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) by state agencies, the Texas Legislature has established an AI advisory council to oversee and guide the use of AI technologies within state government. The council’s role includes studying current AI applications, assessing the need for an AI code of ethics, and ensuring transparency and accountability in AI deployment. This initiative underscores the state’s commitment to responsible AI integration, balancing innovation with ethical considerations and public trust.
- https://www.poynter.org/tech-tools/2017/the-texas-tribune-is-using-a-facebook-messenger-bot-to-reach-new-audiences/ – In 2017, The Texas Tribune launched ‘Paige,’ a Facebook Messenger bot designed to provide legislative updates and engage readers in a conversational manner. Named after legislative pages, Paige aimed to make information more accessible and foster direct communication with the audience. The initiative reflects the Tribune’s commitment to innovation in journalism, utilizing emerging technologies to enhance reader engagement and information dissemination.
- https://www.ft.com/content/aa191322-13b1-4468-ab7b-431dfee2cc07 – The Financial Times (FT) has partnered with OpenAI to train AI models using its content, raising concerns about the future of journalism in the context of AI developments. While the FT will receive payment and attribution, there are apprehensions that this could mirror the 1990s scenario where media companies failed to protect their content’s value against Big Tech’s exploitation. A Columbia University study suggests that Google should be paying US publishers much more for their news content than they currently do. Moreover, AI’s capacity to directly deliver content without directing users to the original sources might exacerbate the power imbalance, benefiting mainly Big Tech companies. The news industry’s erosion over the last two decades, especially at the local level, is also highlighted. Despite the potential of AI, skepticism remains about its productivity benefits and whether it might merely serve to reduce labor costs in various industries. The debate continues, with particular concerns about journalism’s survival amidst AI advancements.
- https://www.twipemobile.com/benefits-and-challenges-of-ai-chatbots-for-top-news-publishers/ – AI chatbots are revolutionizing newsroom operations by automating routine tasks, thereby enhancing efficiency and allowing journalists to focus on in-depth reporting. For instance, Germany’s OVB Media developed ‘Wortwandler,’ an AI-powered editing software that has significantly improved its editorial workflow, saving the company half a million euros annually. Similarly, Der Spiegel created an in-house AI fact-checker to assist journalists in quickly verifying information, speeding up the reporting process while maintaining accuracy and trustworthiness. However, the adoption of AI tools also presents challenges, including audience skepticism and concerns about the potential loss of jobs. A report by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism highlights that while some audiences understand the benefits of AI chatbots, there is also significant skepticism regarding their use in newsrooms. Therefore, news organizations must balance the advantages of AI integration with the need to maintain public trust and journalistic integrity.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative references recent experimentation and discussions related to AI chatbots, indicating it is relatively up-to-date. However, it does not appear to include the most recent developments or findings as of the current date.
Quotes check
Score:
7
Notes:
There are no direct quotes provided in the text, but statements attributed to Darla Cameron suggest that quotes may exist in referenced sources. Without explicit quotes, it’s challenging to verify their originality.
Source reliability
Score:
8
Notes:
The narrative originates from a Substack publication and references reputable sources like the Texas Tribune and Poynter. While not a mainstream news outlet itself, the information is grounded in credible sources.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
The claims about AI chatbots in newsrooms and their challenges are plausible and align with current trends in media technology. The involvement of organizations like the Texas Tribune adds to the credibility.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The narrative is generally well-supported by references to reputable media outlets and current technological trends. However, the lack of concrete, original quotes and the reliance on secondary sources reduce confidence in its originality and timeliness.
Register for Editor’s picks
Stay ahead of the curve with our Editor's picks newsletter – your weekly insight into the trends, challenges, and innovations driving the future of digital media.
