5:09 am - October 29, 2025

No-paywall model and independence pitch help drive 33% jump in revenue.

The Guardian US is on course to raise $44 million from reader donations in 2023 — a 33 per cent increase on the previous year — driven by political upheaval, strategic fundraising and a pitch for independence in a polarised media landscape.

More than 60 per cent of the US operation’s revenue now comes from voluntary contributions. A single first-person story by a Canadian citizen detained by ICE brought in $105,000, underlining the power of compelling journalism to drive support.

US editor Betsy Reed said the organisation’s appeal rests on its independence and refusal to bow to corporate or political interests. “All around us, media organisations have begun to capitulate,” she said in a fundraising appeal placed at the bottom of all Guardian articles.

In an interview with New York magazine, Reed pointed to the past ownership of US titles such as the Washington Post and Los Angeles Times as part of the reason trust has eroded, particularly with Donald Trump and his allies launching legal action against outlets critical of them.

“Our messaging does appeal to people to support our work as a kind of cause, and I think that works for a number of reasons,” said Reed. “But one is that there is a real crisis of access to reliable information for people who don’t want or have the means to subscribe to the New York Times. That is a real problem that we have an answer to.”

The last week of February marked the second-highest week for reader revenue in the Guardian US’s history. Monthly unique visitors now average between 40 and 50 million, split evenly between US and international audiences.

The Guardian’s no-paywall model has been central to its pitch. While many rivals have shifted to subscription or membership models, the Guardian continues to rely on donations, supported by broad access to its journalism. Managing director Steve Sachs said the industry was paying close attention. “If you’re creative enough, you can figure out some new things,” he said, though he acknowledged that scalability remains an open question.

The Guardian insists it maintains a non-partisan stance. But its fundraising clearly taps into current political tensions, which have helped it expand operations and build out its US newsroom.

Reed and Sachs both said interest in global issues remains strong, even as American readers respond to domestic stories. Whether the current model proves sustainable beyond the current political moment remains to be seen.

Source: Noah Wire Services

More on this

Noah Fact Check Pro

The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.

Freshness check

Score:
8

Notes:
The narrative refers to current events and trends, such as political landscapes and fundraising efforts. However, it lacks specific, very recent data or events that would confirm its freshness as of the latest developments.

Quotes check

Score:
6

Notes:
The quotes provided, such as those from Editor Betsy Reed and Managing Director Steve Sachs, do not have an identifiable original source or date online. While they seem authentic, verifying their origin is challenging without further context.

Source reliability

Score:
8

Notes:
The narrative originates from NYMag, which is generally considered a reliable publication, although not as universally recognized for fact-based reporting as major news outlets like the BBC or Financial Times.

Plausability check

Score:
9

Notes:
The claims about The Guardian’s reader donations and no-paywall model are plausible given the context of increasing support for independent journalism amid political tensions. The narrative aligns with known trends in the media industry.

Overall assessment

Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS

Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM

Summary:
The narrative appears generally plausible and well-supported by the current media landscape. However, verifying specific quotes and ensuring total freshness is somewhat difficult. The reliability of the publication contributes to the overall confidence in the information presented.

Tags:

Register for Editor’s picks

Stay ahead of the curve with our Editor's picks newsletter – your weekly insight into the trends, challenges, and innovations driving the future of digital media.

Leave A Reply

© 2025 Tomorrow’s Publisher. All Rights Reserved. Powered By Noah Wire Services. Created By Sawah Solutions.
Exit mobile version
×