The resurgence of Hayao Miyazaki’s condemnation of AI coincides with AI image generators replicating Studio Ghibli’s signature style, reigniting controversies over licensing, artist rights, and evolving legal frameworks amidst mounting corporate and creative tensions.
Studio Ghibli’s AI Style Controversy Highlights Broader Copyright and Ethical Challenges in AI-Created Art
Introduction
This report analyses a recent controversy sparked by the resurfacing of a 2016 video in which Hayao Miyazaki, founder of Japanese animation studio Studio Ghibli, condemned artificial intelligence (AI) as “an insult to life” and “utterly disgusting.” The discussion resurfaced alongside the emergence of AI image generators that replicate Studio Ghibli’s artistic style without clear licensing. The ensuing debate touches on the ethics of AI training on copyrighted creative works, evolving copyright law, and the impacts on human artists and creative industries. The source article is from Campaign Asia [1].
1. Miyazaki’s Strong Ethical Opposition to AI in Creative Arts
Hayao Miyazaki’s 2016 statements resurfaced to ignite debate on AI’s implications for creativity. Miyazaki emphatically rejected integrating AI tools into his studio’s creative process, calling it “an insult to life itself” and “utterly disgusting.” This reflects a profound ethical concern regarding AI’s role in artistic creation—specifically that AI undermines the essence of human creativity and life expressed through art [1].
2. The Studio Ghibli Style and Current AI Use Controversy
The debate surged with the arrival of AI tools capable of generating images in the distinctive Studio Ghibli style. Users, including high-profile figures like ChatGPT CEO Sam Altman who changed his social media profile to a Ghibli-style portrait, used these tools to create derivatives mimicking Ghibli animations. However, it remains unclear whether these AI models had the licensing rights to use the Ghibli artistic style during their training. Artist Karla Ortiz criticised this usage as exploitation, emphasising that it appropriates Ghibli’s brand and legacy to promote OpenAI products without consent [1].
3. Emerging Legal Responses and Industry Perspectives on AI and Copyright
3.1 Legislative Amendments and Lobbying Efforts
Tech companies such as OpenAI and Google are lobbying governments to permit AI models to train on copyrighted materials under fair use grounds. They argue this exemption is crucial for national security and AI innovation. Meanwhile, countries like Japan and Singapore have amended copyright laws to allow such use, with others like the UK and Hong Kong considering similar exceptions [1].
3.2 Criticisms and Alternative Legal Frameworks
Critics reject the notion that AI training on copyrighted works constitutes fair use. They advocate for more robust compensation frameworks for artists, even if it increases costs for AI platforms. Seth Hays of APAC Gates highlights the challenges and potential of text and data mining (TDM) exceptions, which are designed to benefit the AI industry but remain technically complex to implement effectively. Some propose new laws protecting unique aspects of creative works, such as the ‘style’ of anime, and strengthening intellectual property (IP) areas like Rights of Publicity, trade dress, and unfair competition, which are currently underdeveloped globally [1].
3.3 Divergent Legal Interpretations: Harm at Training vs Output Stage
Marc Hoag, an AI and copyright attorney, provides a different perspective. He argues that the fundamental harm in copyright arises not during AI training but at the stage of output when users purposefully create infringing derivative works. He explains that AI training involves transforming patterns into statistical weights, not copying or storing works in a traditional sense, suggesting that requiring licensing for training would stifle innovation. Hoag advocates for legislative exemptions specifically excluding AI training from copyright infringement liability [1].
4. Industry Reactions and Practical Implications for Creative Services
The tension between innovation and artist rights is evident across creative sectors. Visual artists and media outlets have filed lawsuits against AI companies alleging copyright infringement through unauthorized use of large image datasets in creating AI models. Advertising agencies, heavily reliant on creativity and legal clarity, navigate these challenges cautiously. Michael Titshall, APAC CEO of RGA, emphasises the necessity of enterprise agreements between platforms and clients to ensure lawful use of AI tools. He warns against unrestricted AI content generation citing the Ghibli example as a cautionary case of unethical appropriation [1].
| Stakeholder | Position on AI and Copyright | Key Concern |
|---|---|---|
| Hayao Miyazaki | Strong ethical opposition to AI in creative production | AI undermines creative life |
| OpenAI/Tech Giants | Lobby for fair use exemptions to train AI on copyrighted work | Innovation and national security |
| Artists & Creators | Demand compensation and stronger protections | Exploitation and copyright loss |
| Legal Experts | Differ on harm stage (training vs output) | Proper regulation locus |
| Advertising Industry | Use AI cautiously under legal agreements | Avoid copyright infringement |
Summary Table: Stakeholder Positions on AI and Copyright Implications
Takeaway
The controversy surrounding AI’s use of Studio Ghibli’s style encapsulates broader legal and ethical questions about AI training on copyrighted works. While tech firms push for broad fair use exemptions to foster innovation, creators and artists demand meaningful protections and compensation. The evolving landscape necessitates updated IP laws and carefully crafted regulations that balance technological progress with respect for original creativity and rights.
Footnotes
[EX1] Reuters – https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/ai-image-generator-lawsuits-copyright-challenges-2023-05/ – Reports on copyright lawsuits against AI image generators
[EX2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) – https://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/artificial_intelligence/ – Overview of AI and intellectual property challenges
[EX3] OECD – https://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/artificial-intelligence-and-intellectual-property-issues.htm – Policy analysis on AI and IP laws
[EX4] The New York Times – https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/29/technology/ai-art-copyright-lawsuit.html – Coverage of artist lawsuits on AI copyright infringement
[EX5] UK Intellectual Property Office – https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/copyright-and-artificial-intelligence-consultation/outcome-copyright-and-artificial-intelligence-consultation-document – UK government consultation on AI and copyright law
[1] Campaign Asia – https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMivgFBVV95cUxPUG9aQWNRZ29sQjJuN1VYVnVkSzVwejFQOUVPdXBRZzAzS3lfcnZpNjRubzhCRURQaEt4NHY0TEsyaTZBRXNvSE9ta0Yzd1pWOERpVWItbjNPUExnM1B3ankzQ3F5V3ZLS3dkQjZ6X2JKamNuc1VGanF1WjNneHZ3MzcxeHZzNVZOTWJoUmF5QUQ5NmRvdHB3cFBkcFJWNnFUUlFBMU13TS1heENURm5iMjBvVnpsX2JwTnRHcjdn?oc=5&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en – Original article forming the basis of this report
- https://apnews.com/article/0f4cb487ec3042dd5b43ad47879b91f4 – This article discusses the ethical concerns raised by AI tools replicating Studio Ghibli’s artistic style without clear licensing, highlighting the controversy over AI-generated images mimicking Ghibli animations.
- https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2025/03/studio-ghibli-memes-openai-chatgpt/682235/?utm_source=apple_news – This piece delves into the implications of AI-generated art, contrasting it with human-created fan art, and touches on the cultural fascination with replicating popular aesthetics through technology.
- https://www.ft.com/content/291de779-2765-4a5c-997e-7139b766f105 – The article emphasizes the importance of recognizing the limits of AI in art and other fields, discussing the dangers of over-relying on AI for tasks requiring human judgment.
- https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/ai-image-generator-lawsuits-copyright-challenges-2023-05/ – This Reuters report covers the legal challenges and lawsuits faced by AI image generators concerning copyright issues, highlighting the broader implications for the industry.
- https://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/artificial_intelligence/ – The World Intellectual Property Organization provides an overview of the challenges AI poses to intellectual property, including issues related to AI-generated art and copyright.
- https://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/artificial-intelligence-and-intellectual-property-issues.htm – The OECD’s policy analysis discusses the intersection of AI and intellectual property laws, addressing the complexities and considerations in this evolving field.
- https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMivgFBVV95cUxPUG9aQWNRZ29sQjJuN1VYVnVkSzVwejFQOUVPdXBRZzAzS3lfcnZpNjRubzhCRURQaEt4NHY0TEsyaTZBRXNvSE9ta0Yzd1pWOERpVWItbjNPUExnM1B3ankzQ3F5V3ZLS3dkQjZ6X2JKamNuc1VGanF1WjNneHZ3MzcxeHZzNVZOTWJoUmF5QUQ5NmRvdHB3cFBkcFJWNnFUUlFBMU13TS1heENURm5iMjBvVnpsX2JwTnRHcjdn?oc=5&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en – Please view link – unable to able to access data
- https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2025/03/studio-ghibli-memes-openai-chatgpt/682235/?utm_source=apple_news – This article discusses the release of an update to OpenAI’s GPT-4o, enabling ChatGPT to generate high-quality images in the style of Studio Ghibli, and explores the mixed reactions, including concerns about intellectual property rights and the potential threat to human creativity.
- https://apnews.com/article/0f4cb487ec3042dd5b43ad47879b91f4 – This piece highlights the viral trend of creating Ghibli-style images using ChatGPT’s image generator, raising ethical concerns about AI tools trained on copyrighted works and featuring artist Karla Ortiz’s criticism of OpenAI’s use of Ghibli’s branding without consent.
- https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/ghibli-effect-chatgpt-usage-hits-record-after-rollout-viral-feature-2025-04-01/ – This report covers the surge in ChatGPT usage following the rollout of the Ghibli-style image generation feature, leading to record active users and discussions about potential copyright violations, with reference to Hayao Miyazaki’s previous criticism of AI-generated images.
- https://www.the-independent.com/arts-entertainment/films/news/studio-ghibli-chatgpt-openai-hayao-miyazaki-trend-copyright-b2723114.html – This article delves into the controversy surrounding ChatGPT’s Ghibli-style image generation, including Hayao Miyazaki’s strong disapproval of AI in creative processes and the ethical implications of replicating artistic styles without consent.
- https://www.openculture.com/2017/03/hayao-miyazaki-tells-video-game-makers-what-he-thinks-of-their-characters-made-with-artificial-intelligence.html – This source provides a transcript of Hayao Miyazaki’s 2016 comments on AI-generated animation, where he expressed his disgust and described it as an ‘insult to life itself,’ emphasizing his opposition to incorporating such technology into his work.
- https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/legendary-animator-hayao-miyazaki-slams-ai-generated-animation-insult-life-itself-1596036 – This article reports on Hayao Miyazaki’s criticism of AI-generated animation, highlighting his concerns about the lack of sensitivity to pain and the potential for grotesque movements, and his refusal to incorporate such technology into his work.
- https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMivgFBVV95cUxPUG9aQWNRZ29sQjJuN1VYVnVkSzVwejFQOUVPdXBRZzAzS3lfcnZpNjRubzhCRURQaEt4NHY0TEsyaTZBRXNvSE9ta0Yzd1pWOERpVWItbjNPUExnM1B3ankzQ3F5V3ZLS3dkQjZ6X2JKamNuc1VGanF1WjNneHZ3MzcxeHZzNVZOTWJoUmF5QUQ5NmRvdHB3cFBkcFJWNnFUUlFBMU13TS1heENURm5iMjBvVnpsX2JwTnRHcjdn?oc=5&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US:en – Please view link – unable to able to access data
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
4
Notes:
Miyazaki’s 2016 quote resurfaces in current debate, but analysis of legal updates (e.g., Japan/Singapore copyright amendments) lacks specific timestamps. No evidence of recycled press releases.
Quotes check
Score:
8
Notes:
Miyazaki’s ‘insult to life’ quote widely attributed to 2016 without verification challenges. Karla Ortiz’s criticism and Marc Hoag’s legal analysis appear original to this narrative.
Source reliability
Score:
6
Notes:
Campaign Asia cited as primary source, which lacks third-party reliability metrics. External citations (WIPO, OECD, Reuters) bolster credibility of referenced legal issues.
Plausability check
Score:
9
Notes:
Claims align with known legal debates (e.g., lawsuits against AI firms) and legislative trends (Japan’s TDM exceptions). Stakeholder positions reflect documented industry tensions.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
Narrative accurately reflects ongoing AI-copyright debates, though primary source reliability is uncertain. Legal updates and stakeholder positions are plausibly reported, but Miyazaki’s recycled quote reduces freshness.
Register for Editor’s picks
Stay ahead of the curve with our Editor's picks newsletter – your weekly insight into the trends, challenges, and innovations driving the future of digital media.
