- A coalition of leading economists highlights the role of independent journalism in global economic health
- Misinformation risks are escalating with AI, threatening social stability and market integrity
- Urgent policy actions are needed to sustain trustworthy media and support economic resilience
A coalition of 11 leading economists, including Nobel laureates Joseph Stiglitz and Daron Acemoğlu, has issued a stark warning that the collapse of independent journalism poses a direct threat to global economic prosperity.
Their new report, The Economic Imperative of Investing in Public Interest Media, published by the High-Level Panel on Public Interest Media convened by the Forum on Information and Democracy, argues that quality journalism is as vital to economies as central banks are to financial systems.
“Public interest media play an essential role in guaranteeing this information supply and ensuring its quality. They are like the central banks of the informational economy: providing the confidence in the system that is necessary for it to function,” the authors write.
The signatories include some of the world’s most prominent economic thinkers: Stiglitz (Nobel 2001), Acemoğlu (Nobel 2024), Philippe Aghion, Sir Tim Besley, Francesca Bria, Diane Coyle, Obiageli Ezekwesili, Mariana Mazzucato, Atif Mian, Andrea Prat, and Vera Songwe.
They warn that while governments are pouring billions into artificial intelligence to drive innovation and growth, they are failing to invest in the information systems that underpin markets and democracy. “Information is a public good that market forces alone will never supply at the level our modern society demands,” the panel states.
The report highlights how authoritarian regimes such as Russia spend multiples more on disinformation campaigns than democracies invest in supporting independent media. In 2024, at least 90 countries were targeted by foreign-funded information manipulation, a trend the authors say is being turbocharged by generative AI.
The economists recommend two urgent policy responses:
- Public investment in innovative models that safeguard free and independent journalism, potentially funded through mechanisms such as a digital services tax.
- New “information industrial policies” to regulate markets in ways that promote pluralism and reward truth over falsehood.
They also point to the upcoming International High-Level Conference on Information Integrity and Independent Media, co-organised by the Forum on Information and Democracy and the International Fund for Public Interest Media in October, as a chance for governments to commit concrete resources.
“It is high time that the true value of public interest media be recognised and that the full range of economic policies that governments have at their disposal be used to stop their decline,” the economists write.
Source: Noah Wire Services
- https://www.mediapool.bg/svetovni-top-ikonomisti-zdravite-ikonomiki-se-nuzhdayat-ot-dobra-zhurnalistika-news375444.html – Please view link – unable to able to access data
- https://www.reuters.com/business/ai-set-transform-global-trade-says-world-trade-organization-report-2025-09-17/ – A World Trade Organization report released on September 17, 2025, highlights the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in global commerce. It forecasts that AI could increase the value of global trade by 34–37% and boost global GDP by 12–13% by 2040. Key drivers of this growth would be reduced trade costs and improved productivity through innovations in logistics, compliance, and communication. AI-powered translation tools, in particular, could allow small producers to compete more effectively in global markets, with potential export growth of up to 11% in low-income countries—conditional on improved digital infrastructure. Despite these benefits, the report warns that AI could widen social and economic inequalities without inclusive policies and investments. It stresses the need for robust education, retraining, and social support systems to address potential job displacement. WTO leadership emphasized the importance of predictable trade rules and lower tariffs on AI-critical raw materials like semiconductors to ensure widespread benefits. The report comes amid growing challenges to the multilateral trading system, including rising protectionism and geopolitical tensions.
- https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/ai-economic-gains-likely-outweigh-emissions-cost-says-imf-2025-04-22/ – According to a report by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), global economic output is expected to rise by about 0.5% annually from 2025 to 2030 due to advances in artificial intelligence (AI), outweighing the environmental costs from increased carbon emissions due to energy-demanding data centers. Although AI adoption will boost global GDP, these benefits will not be evenly distributed, prompting the IMF to urge policymakers and businesses to manage societal impacts responsibly. The report estimates that global electricity usage driven by AI could more than triple by 2030, reaching 1,500 terawatt-hours—equal to India’s current usage—and result in a cumulative 1.2% increase in greenhouse gas emissions under current policies. The associated social cost of emissions, estimated at $50.7 to $66.3 billion, remains smaller than the projected economic gains. However, the environmental impact of AI will depend significantly on its applications. Organizations like the Grantham Research Institute suggest that AI could promote sustainability if properly directed, especially in enhancing low-carbon technologies. They emphasize the need for government and corporate action to ensure AI contributes to equitable and sustainable development through targeted policies and renewable energy initiatives.
- https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/global-audiences-suspicious-ai-powered-newsrooms-report-finds-2024-06-16/ – Global concerns about the use of AI in news production and misinformation are growing, a report published by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism found, posing fresh challenges to newsrooms already struggling to engage audiences. The institute’s annual Digital News Report highlights consumer fears regarding AI’s role in misinformation and the ethical implications of AI-generated content. The survey, which sampled 2,000 participants, indicates that audiences are increasingly skeptical about AI’s influence on journalism, affecting trust and engagement.
- https://www.trust.org/2025/01/28/journalists-cautiously-optimistic-about-the-effect-of-ai-on-the-profession-our-new-report-finds/ – A new report from the Thomson Reuters Foundation finds that journalists in the Global South and emerging economies are cautiously optimistic about the effect of artificial intelligence (AI) on journalism. From enhanced efficiency to personalized reporting, AI is changing how news is produced, distributed, and consumed. The report, based on surveys of over 200 journalists across more than 70 countries, highlights both positive perceptions and concerns regarding ethical issues, training gaps, digital access, and the potential erosion of human-centered skills.
- https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/10/news-media-literacy-trust-ai/ – In the run-up to the 2024 election, these risks stand to be further exacerbated by AI. News avoidance is at record levels, with interest in the news declining, and people making tough choices about paying for subscriptions amid economic hardships. The decline of social media traffic and the rise of generative AI threaten media business models by reducing the need for users to click through to news sites. The industry faces challenges including rising costs, layoffs, and the slowdown in growth, all impacting media trust and revenue.
- https://www.globenewswire.com/de/news-release/2025/03/18/3044354/0/en/Concerns-about-AI-and-social-media-grow-among-journalists-ahead-of-Federal-Election-survey-finds.html – A new survey of over 500 journalists revealed increasing concerns about the rapidly changing media landscape, especially regarding generative AI and social media fragmentation. Despite some adoption, widespread anxiety persists about AI’s impact on journalistic integrity, job security, and misinformation. The report underscores the complex relationship journalists have with social media, noting the decline in trust, prevalence of bias, and the challenges arising from platform shifts and technological changes.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative is fresh, with the earliest known publication date being September 23, 2025. The report was issued on the same date, indicating timely coverage. No evidence of recycled content or republishing across low-quality sites was found. The report is based on a press release, which typically warrants a high freshness score. No discrepancies in figures, dates, or quotes were identified.
Quotes check
Score:
10
Notes:
Direct quotes from the report were not found in earlier material, suggesting potential originality. The report includes statements from Nobel laureates Joseph Stiglitz and Daron Acemoglu, which appear to be exclusive to this release.
Source reliability
Score:
10
Notes:
The narrative originates from a reputable organisation, the Forum on Information and Democracy, formed by Reporters Without Borders and the French state. The inclusion of Nobel laureates Joseph Stiglitz and Daron Acemoglu adds credibility to the report.
Plausability check
Score:
10
Notes:
The claims made in the report are plausible and align with current discussions on the impact of AI on journalism. The report’s findings are consistent with concerns raised by other reputable sources about the challenges facing public interest media in the age of AI. The language and tone are appropriate for the subject matter, and the report provides specific factual anchors, including names, institutions, and dates.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): PASS
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The narrative passes all checks with high confidence. It presents fresh, original content from a reputable source, with plausible claims supported by specific details.
Register for Editor’s picks
Stay ahead of the curve with our Editor's picks newsletter – your weekly insight into the trends, challenges, and innovations driving the future of digital media.
